Gauge and the scalar bottleneck
Canonical cross-family angles predict pairwise disagreement
inconclusive registered
The reading
-
the canonical angle between two RMs' reward directions predicts their held-out disagreement rate
spearman_canonical_angle_vs_disagreement > 0.6 0.5 not measured inconclusive
-
the correlation clears a model-clustered permutation null
xfam_perm_p < 0.05 not measured inconclusive
Provenance
- card
- GAUGE-XFAM
- frozen_at
- adjudicated_at
- spec_hash
- spec:092fef0fc58c288b71ea361dce7b5738
- study_id
- study:campaign-gauge-xfam@v1#092fef0f
- Evidence records
- 095096260d9209c4fb9935cbb215812b
- spec_file
- campaign-gauge-xfam.json